Cricinfo



Cricinfo Registration

home Cricinfo 3D Audio Stats Fantasy Slogout Video Help and Feedback

 

Live Scorecards
Fixtures | Results
3D Animation
India v Australia
Bangladesh v N Zealand
T20 Canada
Stanford 20/20 for 20
ICC Intercontinental Cup
ICC WCL Division 4
Indian Cricket League
Current and Future Tours
News
Photos | Wallpapers
Cricinfo Magazine
Match/series archive
Records
Statsguru
Players/Officials
Grounds
Women's Cricket
ICC
Rankings/Ratings
Wisden Almanack
Games
Fantasy Cricket
Slogout
Daily Newsletter
Toolbar
Widgets



Dick Pound slams Cricket Australia punishment

Drugs chief attacks 'disappointing' Warne ban

Cricinfo staff

December 4, 2006



Newspaper reports at the time of the ban © Getty Images
Shane Warne is in the headlines for the wrong reasons with the publication of a book by Dick Pound, the head of the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), in which Pound says that Cricket Australia should have banned Warne for longer than 12 months after testing positive for a diuretic in 2003.

Warne is slammed by Pound in Inside Dope, in a chapter on the worst excuses he has heard for positive drug tests.

"Warne said his mother had given him a diuretic so that he would look slimmer on television, without mentioning the shoulder injury from which he was trying to recover," Pound said. "The diuretic was a masking agent that could have hidden the possible use of steroids that would help the injury cure faster. He had returned to play almost twice as quickly as the experts had predicted."

Warne tested positive for diuretic substances hydrochlorothiazide and amiloride and received a one-year ban from Cricket Australia in 2003. He initially told the media that he intended to fight the ban, but later changed his mind, saying it was the Australian way to "take it in the chin". At the time, Cricket Australia described his testimony - and that of his mother - as "vague and inconsistent".

"I was very disappointed with the one-year ban that the Australians gave to Warne," Pound said. "I think you only have to look at what the Australians say about the issue of doping and then look at what they do when their own sportsmen fail tests. Warne was extremely lucky but, at the time, it was not a decision in which WADA had any right to intervene."

Warne declined to comment, but Peter Young, a CA spokesman, defended the one-year ban. "We went through a detailed process with a panel consisting of three experts, including Justice Williams from Queensland, and their findings were published in considerable detail and have been on public record for three years," he said. "We are satisfied that we went through a rigorous and appropriate process under the anti-doping laws as they stood at that time."

 
Post this story on your favourite website Email this page to a friend Print this page Feedback
Fantasy cricket: India v Australia and Bangladesh v New Zealand
Login to check the standings
    Watch our daily Cricinfo SportsCenter news round-ups
Available on Cricinfo.tv
    Live scores, news & ball-by-ball commentary on your phone
Cricinfo Mobile

Cricinfo Mobile


Related Links



Players/Umpires

Teams






Cricinfo Products
Fantasy cricket - India v Aus & Bangladesh v NZ
Check the standings
Scores, text comms & news on your phone
Cricinfo Mobile
Play Slogout - our cricket action simulation game
Two formats to choose from
Add a Cricinfo Widget to your website now
Portable apps for your site
 
Sponsored Links
Light a Diya this Diwali
with Western Union
India v Australia shopping at Cricshop
Kit, DVD, books & more
Follow the new 2008/09 Premier League season
On ESPNsoccernet
The best online rugby coverage - Scrum.com
Site just re-launched
 


 
Top 5 player searches
Most read stories