Patil sacked! Madan Lal is new Indian manager (25 Sep 1996)
Sandeep Patil sacked
25-Sep-1996
25 Sept 1996
Sandeep Patil sacked! Madan Lal is new Indian cricket manager
Syed Firdaus Ashraf, Shailesh Soni and M S Shanker
The Board of Control for Cricket in India's decision to sack
Indian manager Sandeep Patil opened to mixed reviews on
Wednesday.
Patil will be replaced by former Test cricketer Madan Lal.
"What I could not achieve as Indian manager, I hope Madan Lal is
able to achieve," Patil told Rediff On The NeT, immediately
after calling his successor in Delhi to congratulate him on his
appointment.
Bishen Singh Bedi, the former Indian captain and another
ex-manager, criticised the appointment, saying" "Madan Lal is
from north India and most of the players in the Indian team are
either from south India or from west India. It would have been
better if the board had appointed Roger Binny or Anshuman
Gaikwad as the cricket manager as they hail from south India."
Gaikwad, in fact, will replace Madan Lal as manager of the
junior Indian team.
"Unfortunately in our country these stupid cricket officials go
on for donkey years. They have no credibility to prove
themselves. It is easy to sit and pass judgement, but it is a
different scene on the ground," Bedi said. "I feel Sandeep
should have been given at least two more years to prove his
credentials."
Bedi, who was himself sacked as manager after the 1990 tour of
England, felt the cricket manager has a distinct identity
compared to the players. "I agreed with the Board when Azhar was
sacked because he was given a long term as captain. But in
Sandeep's case there was no reason to sack him."
Ajit Wadekar, Patil's predecessor as Indian manager, agreed with
Bedi. "The Board gave me one more year as manager. I think they
should have given some more time to Sandeep. The Indian team
travelled a lot under his tenure. And to play in another country
is totally different from playing in India. I donUt think it was
a wise decision by the Board," he said.
Wadekar, who had a successful tenure as manager, felt "our
players are getting stale. They are tired. Even in Azhar's case
they should have allowed him to continue for some more period as
captain."
On the other hand, M L Jaisimha, the former Test star, felt,
"It's good the Board realised their mistake. Not that Sandeep is
a bad man. But, unfortunately, he could not fit the bill.
Whether it was his mistake or someone else's in the team, we
suffered defeat after defeat in the Singer and Sahara Cups."
"His experiments of shuffling opening pairs frequently cost the
team dearly. Moreover, what Patil failed to realise was that
these decisions had adverse effects on the concentration of the
top order batsmen, especially Azharuddin and Rahul Dravid
besides skipper Tendulkar. By doing so, he only put more
pressure on young Sachin," Jaisimha felt.
However, he was not sure whether Madan Lal would prove a
suitable successor to Patil. "One thing is sure: He will give
top priority to discipline in the team," Jaisimha said. "I feel
he (the manager) should command respect from the players. His
very presence should be a morale booster.''
Maninder Singh, the former Test leftarm spinner, also felt that
Patil was given enough opportunities to prove his worth. "He did
not prove his credentials. So there were reasons for him to be
removed."
Maninder felt Madan Lal would make a good manager. Recalling his
encounters with the new Indian manager, he said, "Madan Lal told
me once that every cricketer must improve his fielding. It was
only then I improved my fielding."
"He was a very hardworking cricketer. But I think what the
Indian team needs at the moment is a good bowling side rather
than a good manager. If we do that, we will be the best,"
Maninder added.
"I feel sad for Sandeep," said former Test offspinner Shivlal
Yadav who was elected a national selector on Tuesday. "It is sad
that Sandeep could not succeed. Madan Lal is a taskmaster,"Yadav
said, pointing out that the Delhi stalwart managed the UAE
national team before he took charge of the junior Indian cricket
squad.
However, former Test batsman Yashpal Sharma felt, "It's not
going to matter who the manager of the Indian cricket team is.
The boys have to perform on the field and if they are not
performing well, what can a manager do?"
"You cannot change a team's fortune overnight," Sharma, a member
of the 1983 World Cup winning side along with Madan Lal and
Patil,said.
Sharma felt Patil was not given enough time to prove himself.
"If tomorrow they make Sunil Gavaskar manager of the Indian
cricket team, will he be able to change the team's performance
in such a short time?" he asked.
He felt the Indian team's performance in the Sahara Cup "was not
up to the mark. Players are playing too much of an
individualistic game to save their places in the side. This is
not going to help the team. Players should be given time and
confidence about their position in the team. Only then can you
expect results."
Arshad Ayub, another former Test offspinner, felt the Indian
team's planning had gone haywire. "To be very honest, there is
no planning as far as the Indian team is concerned. In both the
Singer and Sahara Cup this hollowness was evident."
Would replacing Patil with Madan Lal solve the side's problems?
Ayub felt it is too early to comment. "I feel the manager should
be someone who can care for every player as a fatherly figure or
a guide and philosopher, to attend to every problem of theirs -
personal or cricketing.''
Copyright 1996 Rediff On The Net All rights reserved
Source :: Rediffusion on the Net (https://www.redifindia.com/)