Cricinfo India



Cricinfo Daily Newsletter

home


Cricinfo 3D

Audio

Stats

Fantasy

Slogout

Video

Help and Feedback



India


News

Features

Photos

Newsletter

Fixtures

Indian Premier League

Indian Cricket League

Domestic Competitions

Domestic History

Players/Officials

Grounds

Records





 





Live Scorecards
Fixtures | Results
3D Animation






England v South Africa
Sri Lanka v India
County Cricket
ICC Intercontinental Cup

Current and Future Tours



News
Photos | Wallpapers




Cricinfo Magazine








Match/series archive
Records
Statsguru
Players/Officials
Grounds



Women's Cricket
ICC
Rankings/Ratings




Wisden Almanack



Games
Fantasy Cricket
Slogout



Daily Newsletter
Desktop Alerts
Toolbar
Widgets







Stand-in umpire explains controversial bad light decision

'Sometimes the umpires have to make a call' - Howell

Dileep Premachandran in Durban

December 28, 2006

Ian Howell, the replacement umpire deputising for the ill Mark Benson, shed some light on the situation that had resulted in play being called off 37 overs before the scheduled close of play. Speaking to the media, he referred to the factors that had influenced the umpires' decision.

On how it unfolded

Just prior to the electricity problem, the light was deemed to be bad, and it was offered to the batsmen. They wanted to stay on the field. When the lights went out, they decided they would continue. The first ball after the lights went out, when VRV Singh almost got a wicket, they tried to stay on a little longer. But eventually they decided they wanted to go off the field.

Then, the lights came on after electricity supply was restored. When we went out, the light had deteriorated and was at a lower reading from when it was initially offered. Asad [Rauf] and I decided we would see what it was like. We had an over from my end [Zaheer Khan]. Then, when [VRV] Singh bowled from the north end, it was decided that the light had deteriorated to the extent that it was unfit for play.

There is a perception at times that it is only the batting side that needs to be taken into account, and that is correct to a degree. They are the ones that will be offered the light, which they were. But sometimes, it gets to the stage that the umpires have to make a call, whether it's unfit for cricket or not.

On whether the reading was the same as the initial one

I can't give you a correct answer on that as replacement umpire. Asad was leading the situation. He was using those guidelines that were used for the past two days as well.

On whether the batsmen were offered light the second time

The light wasn't offered to them again. We get to a stage when we're unhappy with the lights and we offer it, and they say yes or no.

On what conditions they deem unfit for play

For picking up the line of the ball, background plays a role. For the over that came from my end, Asad was struggling to pick up the ball from side on.

Dileep Premachandran is features editor of Cricinfo

Add to del.icio.us | digg this | Stumble It What's this?

Live scores, results, news, features and more - a click away
Download the Cricinfo Toolbar
Current Cricinfo fantasy games - SL v Ind, Eng v SA & County Cricket
Login and check the standings
Live scores from across the world on your mobile phone
Cricinfo Mobile
Cricinfo home Print this page Email this page to a friend Feedback



Related Links



Stories

Matches

Players/Umpires

Series/Tournaments

Teams






Cricinfo Products
The Cricinfo Quiz - Sri Lanka v India special
Test your knowledge
Current fantasy - SL v Ind, Eng v SA & County
Check the standings
Play Slogout - our cricket action simulation game
Two formats to choose from
Add a scores widget now (new Cricinfo apps)
News/photos also available

Sponsored Links
Legends of Cricket DVDs - new editions out now
Available at Cricshop
Play 2008/09 Premiership fantasy football
At ESPNsoccernet
2008 Tri-Nations rugby coverage at Scrum.com
Live scores, news & more



 
Top 5 player searches
Most read stories