Food for Thought - Losing the wizards (Part III)

Wizards, whether in the shape of players, administrators or other technocrats are not easy to find. Some of them are born and destined as such while others achieve top positions through dint of sheer hard work and relentless effort to enhance their basic talent. Each one is worth millions to any organisation.

Letting go waste such people amounts to depriving an organisation of invaluable assets. Unfortunately PCB seems to have accepted letting go two of its wizards, Wasim Akram, slashed by the Selection Committee and Javed Miandad, walking out the door, said to be a victim of 'palace intrigues and jealousies'.

Wasim's exclusion from the practice camp to prepare 27 probables for Asian Test Championship and the visiting New Zealand team has raised a hue and cry far and wide. Disappointment has been expressed at home and abroad about on inviting a number of 'non-entities' under the garb of "concentrating on young talent with an eye on 2003 World Cup".

The media is full of reports, articles and comments criticising the PCB for the shabby treatment given such a great cricketer. This also appeared in a panel discussion conducted by Radio Pakistan. Excluding Akram from the training camp and telling him to prove his form and fitness in two practice matches being held before the final selection, was considered to be ridiculous. Cricket observers attribute this Selection Committee decision as a downright insult of an outstanding cricketer of his times, who holds the world record of clinching over 400 wickets both in the tests as well as one-day internationals.

The issue reflects two completely different sides of the picture. Skipper Waqar Younis who was thought to have opposed Akram's inclusion among the probables has denied it by saying that 'he only knew about the names of players and the omission of some top players when he arrived home from abroad'. When questioned, he even denied having called the former Pakistan Captain 'problematic', as some press correspondents termed it.

Waqar Younis in fact came out in support of his dropped pace-partner by saying, "I never had any problems with Akram and to use the word 'drop' for a player of his calibre is not right. It all depends on his fitness and form...Akram can come back in the side through trial matches."

In contrast, Chief Selector Wasim Bari's remarks on the subject carried a tinge of arrogance. He maintained that it was a unanimous decision by the selectors who picked the best possible combination from which the Pakistan side will be formed for the Asian Test Championship. Insisting on the form and fitness of the dropped players, he emphasised, 'the players must show their worth again in the domestic first class season starting in September.'

The Chief Selector's attitude and the PCB's endorsement of his theme 'that upcoming fast bowlers who are working hard to earn a place in the national side should be tried in the home series which was the best opportunity for them to prove their worth' indicate that there are no roses in the basket for Wasim Akram.

Despite all his achievements he is almost back to 'square one'. He is likely to be picked for the two matches to be played on August 17 and 20 between the Camp Trainees XI and the Rest, during which his performance will be evaluated like others. Congratulations Wasim Akram, you are being treated as a 'youngster' again! Then what else can be said, if a player like Chris Cairns considers you "the greatest cricketer he has ever played against"?

My advice to the PCB is to not blindly follow the dictates of the selection committee but also use its own imagination to decide important issues. Let's be clear one cannot win a tournament like the World Cup with a team comprising players having only two years international experience.

While the Pakistan cricket team is set on the path of losing a great cricketer like Wasim Akram, the PCB has lost an illustrious figure in world cricket, Javed Miandad. The irony is that the people at the helm of Pakistan's cricket do not feel sorry about losing these two invaluable diamonds. I only wish someone would realise that players of such calibre are born once in a century.

Miandad has reached Bangladesh on a coaching assignment where he and former West Indies quickie Andy Roberts are to prepare the Bangladesh team for the Asian Test Championship. Though not a permanent assignment, Miandad's act of withdrawing from all the assignments of PCB is shrouded in mystery.

After recently serving as coach of the Pakistan team, he was appointed Chairman of the newly formed Management Committee that had the important mandate of looking after the affairs of domestic as well as international cricket. Not willing to carry on, he declined to hold the appointment on the pretext of 'non-availability of time'.

Surprisingly, before departure Miandad returned all the items issued to him by the PCB including the car and a mobile telephone - enough to indicate his disenchantment with the Board. His initial attachment with Bangladesh cricket is said to be of only 3 weeks duration and he could have done the task easily while holding his job in the PCB. Former Test cricketer, Iqbal Qasim who was appointed as his deputy was competent enough to carry on the job during his absence. His severing of relationship with the PCB smells of some sort of politics.

Since his involvement in Pakistan's cricket affairs, whether as a coach, member of the Advisory Council or Chairman of the Management Committee, Miandad did not really have a happy time. Troubles arose on different occasions turning him into a controversial figure. Whether it was on account of his inability to adjust himself or others' unwillingness to accept him, only the Board would know.

It was, however, a great gesture on the part of PCB Chairman to say that 'the doors of PCB were open for him and he could resume again on his sweet will' but somehow it is not enough. Apart from his status as a world-class cricketer and captain, Miandad is a wizard as far as knowledge of the game is concerned. A player of his calibre would be an asset for any cricket body and on any assignment. Like any other human being he may be have his idiosyncrasies but let us not forget that a king is a king who must be treated and respected as such.

It is unfortunate that, the PCB is still inhabited by people who do not like the presence of those wiser or more competent than them. Thus differences still crop up, turning into conflicts and controversies.

The principal officers of the Board need to involve themselves more actively and monitor closely, the working of all committees. There would be no harm in taking advice of some 'neutral observers' when required. It is wonderful to know that the PCB has hired the services of a psychologist. Besides looking after the players, let him also study the 'attitude problem' that badly ails the cricket body and find a remedy.