The player's view: Murray Goodwin on the fifth one-day international
Zimbabwe gained a consolation victory in the final one-day international against Sri Lanka, and Murray Goodwin played a major part in seeing them home after a minor crisis in the middle order
John Ward
23-Dec-1999
Zimbabwe gained a consolation victory in the final one-day
international against Sri Lanka, and Murray Goodwin played a
major part in seeing them home after a minor crisis in the middle
order. Here he talks to John Ward about that match.
JW: Murray, what was the mood in the Zimbabwean camp before the
final match?
MG: When we arrived at the ground it was obviously a do-or-die
situation because of the bad publicity we have had. The crowds
weren't turning up to the games, and we felt we had to perform to
put ourselves back on the supporters' maps, so to speak, and get
them coming in again. So everyone was pretty fired up, but in
saying that we were also pretty relaxed, because we had already
lost the series and so had nothing else to lose now. We had
played good cricket for half the games before; it was just a
matter of putting both pieces together and we were both relaxed
and also determined to show the supporters that we can still play
well at this level.
There was a relaxed feeling at the warm-ups in the morning before
we lost the toss and they decided to bat. That was surprising
because they like to chase and they are very good chasers. I
don't know why they did that, but it helped us; I don't know what
Andy [Flower] was going to do but I told him we should bowl first
as it helps our bowlers by getting a little bit out of the pitch
in the morning, but I don't know what he wanted to do. But I was
nice just to be relaxed and focused, and I think we just went out
there and enjoyed ourselves.
JW: Just the thought of bowling first and having to chase a
target: memories of that disastrous match in Bulawayo might come
back.
MG: Yes, unfortunately there we had a bit of a stuff-up in the
middle when we had eight or ten overs where we only scored about
20 runs, and that put a huge amount of pressure on us because we
had been going along superbly when it just halted. We should
have done that easily.
Having said that, in this game the scores were similar - only a
few runs different - and I think we just wanted to go out there
with a positive frame of mind and keep the strike rotating, which
hadn't happened in Bulawayo for a period. That was my job, to
come in after we had lost those two wickets, to join Stuart there
and rotate the strike.
When Sri Lanka batted, it was good to get Jayasuriya out quickly
caught down the leg side because he's a very dangerous player,
but the guys seemed to bowl in the right area, as opposed to what
we did the day before. With our bowling at times we seemed to
give them two easy balls an over to score a boundary, and that's
not good enough at this level. I know they guys don't mean to do
it, but it happens, and it's happened too often at times. It
puts pressure on the team that way, but in saying that yesterday
we bowled really well; the guys hardly bowled any extras, and
that had been a huge problem for us - too many wides in
particular.
We just seemed to bowl in the right area; Guy didn't think he had
bowled very well, but he took wickets for us, and it sometimes
works that way. He's bowled superbly in some of the games and
hardly got any wickets, so it works in roundabouts. It was nice
to get wickets just at the right times, and if we had fielded a
little better who knows, we might have got them out for 180 or
190, but a couple of run-outs were missed.
I thought John Rennie did a superb job and Bryan Strang bowled
pretty well, even though he hasn't been considered for the other
games, but Bryan's one of these bowlers who has the Pom-Mbangwa
sort of accuracy and he can generally put it on the spot. That's
what we did yesterday just to create pressure. If you're bowling
a line and length you can set fields for it, whereas the day
before Andy struggled to set a field because every bad ball was
going to the boundary. We were bowling short or full, not a
length.
One thing we have found difficult as batsmen is that the Sri
Lankan bowlers seem to be more disciplined, and our openers apart
from one game had to make the four-balls; they weren't given
half-volleys or long hops. They had to use their feet to come
down or move around the wicket to place the ball in the gaps, and
it was superb batting by Grant and Alistair against such
disciplined bowling. It's nice to see that we turned that around
and bowled similarly to the way they had been bowling to us.
That created pressure, and the guys backed up well in the field.
JW: I was just thinking that if we do have times when the
bowlers spray it around a bit, somebody like yourself might
develop his bowling a bit so you can be like one of these
negative New Zealand medium-pace 'dobbers' and keep things quiet.
MG: Yes, it's something that I'm starting to work on a bit more
now, and I feel I can play a role in bowling my four or five
overs like that, just giving away three or four an over, and get
through a few overs so the better bowlers can come on.
JW: Any particular tactics that were used that you can talk
about, to keep quiet or dismiss the Sri Lankan batsmen?
MG: It was just a matter of not giving them any width because
all their batsmen seem to appreciate it if they get any width;
they free their hands and have a go at the ball, and if it goes
over it goes over, if it goes in the gap it goes in the gap, if
it goes to hand it goes to hand. They don' seem to care, and
that's something that maybe we can learn from, that they back
themselves to whack the ball, in the gaps or over. Our job is
just to bowl pretty straight to most of their batsmen and try to
set a field accordingly. If we bowl too full or too short, it
disappears, so we have to bowl a line and length. We did that in
Bulawayo, and they scored only 213, and we did it yesterday, but
in other games it wasn't quite as disciplined.
JW: I noticed at the start of the Test matches the Sri Lankans
seemed to expend a lot more energy beating the ball about than
the Australians or South Africans, but with no better results, as
they hit the ball straight to a fielder so often, whereas the
others waited their time and placed the ball into the gaps more
skilfully. But by the end of the tour the Sri Lankans seemed to
be placing the ball better and conserving their energy, with
better results!
MG: Definitely. They're very good players of spin and pace, but
particularly spin, where they place the ball superbly well. They
know where to place it and what balls they can hit for four and
what they can push for one. It's very hard setting fields for
our spinners, but our spinners did quite a good job in the end.
Grant is only a part-timer, but Andy Whit in keeping them down to
four an over in his spells did well. It was disciplined bowling
that really put the pressure on them and went a long way towards
our winning that game yesterday.
JW: The target was similar to that we were set in Bulawayo, but
our opening pair went off much more quickly. Was that a
deliberate policy, or was it that with Sri Lanka missing three of
their top bowlers it was a bit easier?
MG: Well, maybe it was little easier, to be honest, but we
scored 80 in 15 overs in Harare with their top bowlers there. It
wasn't so much that it was easier, because they are all good
bowlers and are all so disciplined, but the biggest problem was
that we lost it in the middle in Bulawayo. Here we didn't do
that; we kept rotating the strike, and that was a big factor in
keeping the momentum going.
JW: We came close to it though, with four wickets going down
quickly, mostly to soft dismissals.
MG: They were bad dismissals: Andy misjudged that university,
Stuey got a top edge, Grant misjudged his run - very soft.
Alistair shouldn't have played his shot after Grant had taken ten
or so off the over. Fortunately we then consolidated; hopefully
the guys will learn as they're all experienced players. Andy in
particular is normally a good runner between wickets, but
unfortunately he misjudged it and there was a good bit of
fielding.
JW: It looked as if some of the guys were getting nervy when
that happened.
MG: Yes, definitely; it was repercussions of Bulawayo, but I was
always confident that if we just batted normally we would get
there. But Guy and I said, "Look, let's just be patient here
because if we have wickets in hand in the last ten overs we'll do
this easily; we don't need to panic." Guy was taking his time,
so there was a little but of pressure, but I had full faith in
him that he would come through because he's a very good striker
of the ball and I was confident that I could rotate the strike.
It was one of those situations where we just had to bat the overs
and not lose too many wickets, and fortunately we did it with
about four overs to go. We didn't have to do anything
extravagant; we just hit the bad ball and pushed the odd single.
JW: The first four you hit was a pull that went close to being a
catch, by the looks.
MG: Yes, it was. I was just too early on the shot, and I had to
wait for it, and I tried to place it, but fortunately it went on
to the fielder so quickly that he missed it.
JW: How were the different Sri Lankan bowlers doing at that
stage?
MG: Gallage was bowling shortish, especially to Grant, because
he's a brilliant front-foot player, and off the back foot he
doesn't hit as many boundaries, but he can still rotate the
strike. Maybe Gallage kept the same length to me, but I'm more
of a back-foot player than Grant is, so I got a few boundaries
away, that relieved the pressure.
The spinners were on at the other end, Chandana and Arnold, and I
had no problem rotating the strike against them because it wasn't
turning a hell of a lot. But they're good bowlers and we just
had to treat them with respect.
JW: Was there any bowler in particular you had to watch out for
at that stage?
MG: I think for myself I was Jayasuriya. He fires in that arm
ball, and he's normally pretty accurate in keeping it right on
your toes, and I think that was the only thing we had to worry
about. I was petty confident that Guy and myself could play the
pace bowling quite comfortably, especially as the bounce was nice
and high.
JW: Guy had a bit of luck with that dropped return catch with
Jayasuriya.
MG: That was a quicker ball, and Guy was too early on it; yes,
that was good fortune.
I think it's a positive thing for Zimbabwe cricket that we won at
least one of these games. They might have rested a couple of
their bowlers, but they're all good bowlers and it doesn't matter
who you're playing against; when you play for your country it's
an honour, and we had to show the public that we could still
perform. It was a positive way to go into the new year.
They are a brilliant fielding side and the public don't realise
how good they are, how quick they are, and it was good to end on
a high note, because we've had a lot of bad publicity. We could
have beaten them in this series if we had played well for both
halves of the game and played to our full potential as we did
yesterday.
JW: Did you manage to enjoy a good relationship with the Sri
Lankans off the field?
MG: Yes, on the whole; there were a couple of guys I didn't find
very friendly, but I had no problems with them off the field.
Whatever happens on the field happens on the field, and it's one
of those things, but I just lose respect for some of their
players the way they play the game: they don't always play like
gentlemen and the way they appeal for everything, when some of
them they know themselves are nowhere near being out. [Murray
was obviously thinking also of his controversial run-out in the
Second Test, although he didn't mention it.] Kaluwitharana we
always got on well with, and the same with players like
Wickramasinghe, Pushpakumara, Russel Arnold and Chandana.
JW: Anything else you would like to mention?
MG: Just that we have a very good batting coach in Dave
Houghton, who is very good technically, and it was nice for the
bowlers to have Carl Rackemann. I know John Rennie and Gary
Brent, for example, have found he has really helped them out. In
the past we didn't really have that, and Heath Streak has been
the main guy trying to pass on advice to other pace bowlers such
as Pom Mbangwa, Henry and others.
I think it has helped our bowlers a lot to have him here, a
bowler who is respected because he's played for Australia and he
was a brilliant bowler. I faced him in Australia in the twilight
of his career and he was brilliant, a very hard man to get away,
and he's mixed in really well with the bowlers and the team in
general. It was really nice to have him with us.